I dare say that the words in
the title are ones that we have all seen too many times over the last fourteen
years or so.
Apart from the
obvious meaning that we are all supposed to think of one may suspect that there
are other meanings hidden beneath the surface.The ‘War on Terra’ ~ i.e. War on the Planet is one of the more obvious,
as well as the fact that it is clearly as much of a War of Terror as one
against ‘Terror’ itself, and we needn’t get into who exactly it is who
is responsible for these atrocities.I
hope my readers will be sufficiently experienced with researching material on
the net to have spent a little time on that.
But the latest interpretation upon which I have
stumbled is a little more recherché than these, and was inspired by my recent
encounter with a lecture collection by Joseph Campbell.
One of the many points which stuck in my mind was
what he said about how the Universe is terrifying, and that is part of its
nature.I also liked the reference to
the Bhagavad Gita which he made, already one of my personal favourites, and in
the translation he chose Krishna’s admonition to Arjuna comes out as ‘Whence
[comes] this ignoble cowardice?’
Facing as he did his cousins the Kauravas who were
preparing to fight Arjuna and the Pandavas to the death, Krishna is urging him
to face up to reality and take responsibility for his action in the situation ~
even though it was terrifying.
I have always liked a story I heard a long time ago
about how mediaeval magicians and alchemists believed that the best way to
master a demon is to look it in the eye and name it, rather than to flee.Fleeing may be appropriate to some physical
dangers, and often is, but fleeing from one’s own inner demons is an example of
the ignoble cowardice that Arjuna is criticised for by Krishna.
An insight which grew on me over many years was the
understanding that as we grow in wisdom and power we gain mastery over greater
energies.But it is actually the case
that the more beyond and outside our own limitations we stretch ourselves, the
greater we grow, the more we understand, and the wiser we become.Within certain guidelines of practicality of
course.But the more we deal with, the
more we become.
I recall a key point which I picked up a few years ago
when I was going through some upgrades in my skills. Successful people do the things that
unsuccessful people are unwilling to do.
Facing terrifying things is difficult for most
people, but magicians and shamans are willing to face terror because it leads
them into places where others are not willing to go, and it teaches them things
that others are not willing to earn, or learn.
One of the worst things about our modern world is
that everything is supposed to be safe.Not only physical things, I am not against safe toys and machines and so
forth, but an absolute unwillingness to engage in any form of risk, even at a
level of social discourse.The pathetic
psychological weaklings who need to have trauma counselling because they saw a
Confederate flag are examples of this.People who cannot accept any form of challenge to their worldview and
have extremely limited politically correct attitudes and expectations.
And what would they think of the terror of
existence?They would probably consider
it politically unacceptable.
So I come to my rather oblique interpretation of the
‘War on Terror’ meme which has been beaten into our psyches.The Terror of Existence is our friend,
because the more we can face it, the greater the challenges and terror we can face
and deal with in our daily lives.But
the ‘War on Terror’ which tries to shut down any challenge or difficulty puts
those who succumb to it in an utterly disempowered state.
The best way to overcome a phobia of say, spiders,
is to have graduated exposure to them so that the fear is extinguished through
the learning process that brings down the emotional response.
Now the kind of things which we have associated as
‘terror’ events are of course bad and dangerous, and I wouldn’t for a moment
try to suggest that we shouldn’t be afraid of them, as I said above about
physical danger.But it is the mental
fear which needs to be overcome.One
may flee from the danger, but one must not flee from one’s own consciousness,
must not hide behind emotions that diminish us and turn us into cowering sheep.
So, face the Terror.This is what Frank Herbert meant in his Bene Gesserit
‘Litany Against Fear’.I will face
my fear.I will allow it to pass over
me and through me, and when it has passed I will turn to see its path.Where it has gone there will be
nothing.Only I will remain.
It is like that old adage ‘Death Walks Behind
You’.Fear is both Enemy and
Friend.Terror is a rite of passage
after which one becomes a stronger and more powerful being.Campbell says that we participate in the
Terror of the Universe, that human existence is Terrifying in itself, in its
existential reality.To make ‘War on Terror’
makes no sense.One cannot make war on
a fundamental aspect of the Universe, one can only manipulate perceptions so
that we feel afraid to face that aspect, cower before it, and thus lose the
strength and empowerment which it can imbue and endow us with since it is that
which can give us self knowledge.It is
a war on our ability to draw strength, to draw courage from that which
challenges us, to make us afraid to be wild, to be ourselves.And so the War on Terror is a war
upon the very nature of the human psyche itself.
Here is the map of the campsite of the Hundredth Monkey event held in
the summer of 1995 near the Malvern Hills which can also be found in the
book and the ebook or kindle versions. Because it is small in the
paperback and there are also limitations with ebooks I've included this
image here which I think should be copyable and then you can enlarge it
and look at the detail.
I
have aimed to reproduce the layout of tents, domes, marquees, caravans
and firecircles as close to how they were at the event, basing this on a
number of photographs I was fortunate enough to have given to me by the
late Bryony Glass, and my friend Brenda Gabriel who was also there.
By some brainstorm I
originally put the link for this map in my book to this page rather than here http://wakingthemonkey.blogspot.co.uk/
where it should have been. So now it can be found on either.
First there is a version sized to this page, and then below a larger version
I
hope it will add to the enjoyment of the book as you follow my
peregrinations around the field and see where I had my various
adventures.
You can purchase a paper or e-book version of my account
of my shamanic rite of passage at The Hundredth Monkey Camp ‘Waking The Monkey!
~ Becoming the Hundredth Monkey’ (A Book for Spiritual Warriors) at
My
original blog with full 2014 Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry online
audio recording links and reportage from most days at the Enquiry and
other material.
I first became aware of how
people would exploit their victimhood way back in the 1980s when I had a friend
who used to joke about how feminists classified people by their level of oppression;
so a woman was oppressed but a black woman was more oppressed, and so on. Nowadays we have endless spiels on the
intersectionality of oppressed classes and feminist analysis. The fact that our society actually funds
this stuff, (and gives the people who spout it moral privilege to abuse and
vilify) which no other society in the history of the world, ever, did, seems to
be a fact that eludes the people who pursue it, perhaps because it doesn’t
support their perpetual cries of their victimhood.
But I get ahead of myself. The situation I seek to analyse, deconstruct
and disarm of its weaponised content is that in which in our contemporary
western society a person can amplify their status by claiming some kind of
suffering or ‘victimhood’.
The first thing I need to make
absolutely clear is that I am not promoting making people suffer, or promoting
‘victimisation’ in any way. This is
absolutely in no way the same thing.
The ‘Victim Mentality’ has
several different aspects.
Firstly, there is the feeling
that the subject has that they have been a victim in some way. That’s not difficult, most people at some
stage in their lives have experienced some negative experience.
The next stage is the important
one. You could just get over it, or
deal with it constructively if it is a larger issue, which might involve taking
countermeasures such as legal recourse.
This may or may not be a good thing or satisfactory. The real negative downturn occurs when
someone decides that in some way this makes them unique, that they have
suffered more than others and that this is a mealticket, or at least something which can be used to exploit others.
This isn’t necessarily a
conscious decision, it can easily be an unconscious chip on the shoulder that
just gets in the way, a grudge that is borne as if it were natural.
What has happened over the last
half century or so is that this has become weaponised through the action of
Cultural Marxism. It is my firm
conviction that this must be deliberate, at least in those who seeded and promoted
these social attitudes.
This is closely linked with
empathy. If someone finds that by
playing on their ‘victimhood’ of whatever form, that they can elicit ‘empathic’
behaviour from those around them, then that playing will be reinforced. Someone recently suggested to me that they
believed that Psychology was ‘no more scientific’ than Politics and
Sociology. And yet neither of these
forms of social study have anything approaching the strength of learning theory
as far back as a century or more, with Pavlov, Watson or Skinner. If you associate stimuli together, they will
be thought of together, and if a response is reinforced with a pleasurable
stimulus, a reward, then its recurrence will be encouraged. The cultural marxists know all about
negative reinforcement, because they employ it all the time in their name
calling, which is intended to ‘extinguish’ your behaviour, as the technical
term goes.
Feminists and teachers of Gender
Studies seem unaware of these basic scientific facts, other than the last.
I am simply pointing out that
displays of ‘victimhood’ get rewarded, and so become more frequent, whereas
they claim that this is just social justice in action.
At the root of this is
‘empathy’. We are told it is important
to be empathic. Certainly we as human
beings have the capacity for empathy, but if we are empathic with every
creature in the entire universe, we would never have the mental attention to
deal with our own concerns.
In the summer of 1974, I took a
tab of LSD, of which there was plenty around at the time. I remember walking in some beautiful gardens
and it was lovely. I remember thinking
that I seemed to have no boundaries and felt that I was one with it all. When I came down a bit I realised that I had
for a while lost any sense of my ego or identity, and whilst it was an
extraordinary experience, was not one which it would be very practical to
experience very often, or in less pleasant conditions.
Empathy is like that. We see images of people suffering on our
screens. Images, which in a world
before photography, newsreels, tv or internet we simply would never see. Now, all of a sudden, millions of people are
looking at images of some poor starving child thousands of miles away.
This brings the opportunity for
guilt tripping in a big way. The media
manipulators are then on to us all to guilt us into how we should be ‘doing
something’ for these people, while they are entirely selective about which
suffering children they show to us. The
suffering homeless of our own people are rarely shown to us in such a way, or
the children of some state that is out of favour with the power elite.
‘Victimhood’ is paraded before
us, and yet, because it is only on a screen, there is nothing we can actually
do, but feel bad about it, and perhaps reach for the credit card to make a donation.
Now this weaponised guilt and
compassion extraction has been ramped up with ‘white guilt’, ‘privilege’, all
manner of vilifications against men and European culture and peoples. But here we see the point where it diverges
from its source. The suffering of
others may be something we can or can’t do something about, should or shouldn’t
do something about, but the weaponised form shoots its barbs right into your
entrails, because, whatever you do decide, you are guilty!
This is a kind of ‘Original Sin’
which White people especially, and White Men most particularly, are apparently
guilty of. You may belong to an
ancestral group which has never had any association with colonisation, slavery
or exploitation of other peoples, but the very fact that you live in a
prosperous, well ordered and law abiding culture is in itself cause for attack,
because you aren’t suffering like the Victims!
It is based on having to give way
to someone else’s pain and suffering.
This may have nothing to do with you at all. Or it may be self inflicted, or the result of living in a culture
where these things are commonplace. The
causes are irrelevant. The only thing
of importance is that people are made to feel bad about themselves, so that
they give away their power to those who claim to be victims, or more likely,
those who falsely claim to act in their interests.
A brief aside here. I have always thought it strange, perhaps
just because I understand the meaning of words, that when a child dies
prematurely, you often hear that ‘tributes’ are given. Tributes, are ‘a sign of respect or
admiration, an award to honour a person's accomplishments. A famous director
receives a lifetime achievement award as a tribute…
etc’
This displays something of the
inappropriate mindset of the victim mentality, which has to give a kind of
worship or applause to the sufferer. To
give ‘Tributes’ to a child who has no accomplishments, however much it might be
loved, is just an inappropriate concept which places value on someone simply
because they have suffered, and for no other reason.
So this valuing of suffering,
regardless of how or why it occurs, as some kind of personal achievement which
puts the subject above others who have not experienced that suffering, has
become a moral right in our society.
Even if someone dies while seeking to illegally enter another country
they are lionised as martyrs, though they might have caused the deaths of
others at the same time. It is as if
every single person on the planet were somehow deified like Jesus for having
suffered in some manner or other. And
meanwhile, this is used to disempower that person who has not suffered, or
apparently not.
The conditioning has been going
on so long that it is lost in the background.
And as with all Cultural Marxist
conditioning, the true values are upside down.
Sure, there are occasions when apologies or reparation might be of some
help, but the real triumph is in the hearts of those who can put their past
defeats behind them and go forward with neither bitterness nor resentment. The SPLC earns no plaudits for its endless
victim exploitation after forty years of Affirmative Action, and massive black
on white crime (I was astonished when I heard the figures). Muslims in Britain whine about the
‘oppressive’ history of the Crusades, but manage to forget the 1,400 year Jihad
against freedom and the civilisation of the West.
These people are cowards who
cannot win on the truth, so they have to work on disarming the minds of their
opponents. Although Sun Tzu, the author
of the ancient text ‘The Art of War’ might approve, since he recommends that to
win without fighting is the goal.
But the proponents of the Victim
mentality are essentially sore losers whose only recourse is to shout ‘No fair’
and the trouble is, that we are so fair that we are disarmed and
we stop defending ourselves in order to get into self examination and doubt and
start questioning whether we had been unfair.
As Stefan Molyneux brilliantly
demonstrates in this video, empathy given to someone who does not reciprocate
is wilful collaboration with the enemy.
They will suck you dry, as you give your all to convince them how
tolerant, open minded and multicultural you are. They don’t give a flying ****.
I posted this video on a cultural
marxist thread I was commenting on, and I got a response which really made me
want to throw up, because it was the typical ‘this is how you become empathic
and if you don’t you are being inhuman and cruel’. If you aren’t empathic all the time, you are a bad person.
So we should be empathic with our
murderers and enslavers it seems. If we
aren’t then we are racists! We have been led down the path and deceived.
I would suggest that you look up John Woolman, a 17th Century Puritan who felt intense guilt that he cared more for his own children than for some unknown child who might (or might not) be starving on the other side of the world. This is a kind of neurosis, or perhaps even psychosis which has absolutely no survival adaptive value for the person who it afflicts, and is quite possibly counter adaptive in its distraction..
Cases should be judged on their
merits and we should not assume that everyone has good intentions. Even those can lead to hell as the saying
goes. I see memes admonishing us not to
judge people. Equally I wish we would
see memes admonishing us to not trust without that trust having been earned. Stefan’s example of not telling a murderer
who wanted to kill your wife where she is demonstrates clearly why we should
not feel obliged to tell the truth or be empathic with people who do not have
our best interests at heart, or whom we at least have reasonable doubts about.
I always found myself getting
twitchy watching episodes of Star Trek in which Picard or Janeaway would trust
an unknown alien vessel and drop their shields without any more reason than
saying that ‘a truly civilised race would be peaceful’ or asserting that
showing trust was a good thing as it encouraged the aliens to do the same
thing. I don’t know if Kirk ever did
that, I may be wrong, but I suspect it was a later development. Frankly, in a real situation that kind of
behaviour would be reckless, and probably in direct contravention of standing
orders..
I can’t help feeling that there
are some manipulated religious concepts and feelings here. We have the ‘Original Sin’ of the White
Privileged, and the sanctification of the sufferers, like Dives and Lazarus in
the parable that Jesus gave of the poor man in Heaven and the Rich Man in
Hell. Perhaps the Rich Man deserved to
be in Hell, but surely not just for being rich, and perhaps Lazarus deserved
Heaven, but surely not just because he was poor.
After having been a Christian for
most of my life, off and on at least, a year or so ago I started to realise how
these kind of Christian tales and mythology weaken the mind so as to feel guilt
over things which are associated with success, and a feeling of somehow being
beholden to the ‘Victim’, who becomes sanctified. I have to reiterate that I am not defending cruelty or bad
treatment, but that ‘Victims’ can become so in an infinite variety of ways, and
if that involves becoming so in a way that was self caused, then no-one else
should feel guilt about it, but rather that person should take responsibility,
and not expect someone whom they can exploit to come and rescue them. Images of Africans on overladen rafts in the
Mediterranean come to mind.
In some cases of course, there is
not even any suffering or real victimhood. The endless moaning of feminists about a society in which women
are held in higher esteem than any other culture in the history of world, and in which men endure extreme
hardship to secure the safety of their women and children is wearisome. It is simply embarrassing to hear these
people playing the victim while they claim that men are becoming
‘obsolete’. Meanwhile almost all
construction and infrastructure maintenance is done by men, and often in harsh
and dangerous conditions.
The cries of ‘Victim’ have become
too shrill and hysterical to be taken seriously any more whether they come from
feminists, migrants or social justice warriors. It has become an exploitable meme that must be resisted at all
costs as it has become perhaps our prime weakness. Literally millions of people are attaching themselves to our
civilisation with no thought, as John Kennedy said, of ‘ask[ing] what you can
do for your country’ but only of how they can exploit it for their own ends,
which now are looking much like the conversion of our society into the one that
many of them came from.
And this from the exploitation of
our compassion for their suffering and victimhood.
What they fail to understand is that there is a
psychological process that goes beyond compassion. When someone realises that their compassion has been played and
exploited the emotion is entirely reversed, and that is an absolutely natural
instinct for survival. That which has
betrayed you must be eliminated, or it will do it again.
The
‘Other’ was coined as a philosophical concept by GFW Hegel some two centuries
ago as a counterpoint to the Self.
In modern
sociological and feminist discourse it has become a weaponised term. It is not, as someone once suggested to me, a typo of 'Mothering'!
Society
is built of in-groups who have normative values and behaviours.This is the way that humans have
evolved.We might see it in early
nomadic ice age tribes, or in the guild structures of mediaeval towns.Ethnic groups have clustered together, just
as those of similar trade or economic standing have always done, or children,
women and men.
Modern
feminist debate often centres around demonising what they describe as
‘Othering’.To ‘Other’ someone is to
see them as ‘Other’ to your social group.This is considered very bad by feminists.Since the current moral imperative is to be ‘inclusive’ and as
‘We Are All One’ we must not perceive anyone as ‘Other’ to ourselves, even if
they are a stranger.
As was
recognised by Hegel, ‘Otherness’ is a logically necessary concept in describing
the world if we are not to resort to solipsism, and yet modern thought seeks to
collapse the distinction between Inner and Outer, whether that be psychologically
Inner and Outer, or materially.
I have
been somewhat incredulous at the ludicrous extent to which this is politicised
and used as an attempted weapon of social control.This amusing little website claims that ‘There are no
others’.None at all.While it is admitted that ‘there’s a
powerful evolutionary drive to identify in some way with a tribe of people who are
“like you” ’ it nonetheless argues that this leads to an ‘insidious’
inclination to ‘other’ people.
Really
all it is saying is that the writer doesn’t like the fact that the creation of
in-groups as an evolutionary strategy exists.This seems to be based on some kind of assumption that we have moved
beyond the need for such survival strategies.Feminism sees any group which has achieved ‘hegemonic’ stature as
essentially ‘oppressive’, despite the fact that these kind of cultures provide
stable milieus for complex societies.
This
seems to me to be either a catastrophically naïve error or a purposefully
intended attempt to undermine what must be a basic survival instinct.Stay with those who are like yourself.They share your genes and your culture.If you stick together you have a better
chance of survival.Allowing strangers
into your midst engages unnecessary risk.The ‘Other’ may in time become friend, but it needs to earn that trust,
that friendship.The feminist wants you
to give that trust without it having been earned, and if you don’t you are a
bad person.
I imagine
my reader will by now have surmised that there is a connection here with the
psychology of the migrant invasion in Europe, November 2015.The feminist sees the traditional protection
of territory as ‘Othering’ the outsider, despite the fact that limited resources
are a very important factor here.Since
in that ideology ‘There is no Other’ everyone is part of our own Global,
Universal Tribe in the Global Village.
And yet
simple game theory will inform us that unless the incomer respects the values
of the group that it is accepted into, the system will collapse.
This is a
classic Cultural Marxist move in which reality is inverted and the truth turned
upside down.In the long established
way of the world, life and evolution, creatures established their territories.The dominant members of these tribes and
clans would be responsible for defending them from ‘Others’;but now, the alpha males who previously were
responsible for maintaining the boundaries and protecting their people are now
made to be the enemy, and the enemies who would invade are encouraged to do so
and celebrated for it.
What we
see taking place with various people in the aftermath of the Paris Bataclan
massacre who are urging us to take more refugees to show our compassion is a
pathological expression of this refusal to recognise the ‘Other’, or to see
beyond the immediate situation at the larger consequences of endless mixing
with it.The Muslims all know that we
are each Other to the Other, but too many Europeans delude themselves that this
is not so, that ‘There is no other’.That to ‘Other’ someone is to dehumanise them.
And so
the Liberal European population has been brainwashed into laying down their
arms, into refusing to stand up for themselves because we have to ‘treat others
as ourselves’.Everyone?Does that mean we have to give them all our
stuff?House and feed them?Let them destroy our civilisation?One refugee, fine.A million?You have to
think again.Probably half the
population of the world would like to get into Europe and get a Social Security
cheque.We have to defend against
this.It is not evil to seek to survive
in the face of millions who would seek to exploit your civilisation.
This is
about boundaries.One of the most
important factors in human development is the establishment of personal
boundaries.To have a sense of
responsibility for oneself and not to over rely or intrude on another.Systems Theory tells us that we need cell
walls, osmotic membranes that protect, select and filter what is permitted to
come into the cell.This is interface
between Self and Other.Where the Known
meets the Unknown.
It is
also about the poor countries who are losing their most energetic young people
to a grandiose and false dream of seeking their fortune in the golden paved
streets of Europe.The Pied Piper of Mr
Soros is enticing them all away form their own countries to destroy
others.Villages in West Africa have
collapsing economies because all the young men are taking ‘the back way’ across
the Maghreb to come to Europe and get rich.There are downsides for others than ourselves.
We are
going to see an interesting process in the coming weeks following the Friday 13th
massacre.The politicians, liberals and
general leftists are going to insist that we keep taking more migrants,
insisting that we ‘shouldn’t give in to fear’ and that turning migrants away
would in some way be ‘giving terrorists what they want’.And yet we have already seen borders being
closed.Sweden had already, incredibly,
closed its border before the atrocity, simply on the basis of there being too
many causing a ‘threat to public order’.
A large
number of State Governors in the USA have declared they will not be taking
Syrian ‘refugees’ following the atrocities, and France has closed its borders.This is clearly a chaos situation which is
not going to improve unless measures are taken to prevent further deterioration
of the situation.It will doubtless
continue to slide for a while as the EU leaders prevaricate.Meanwhile the resolve of the European
peoples is rising.It is quite clear
that the Videgrad 4 ~ Poland, Czech/Slovakia and Hungary are taking a firm
stand and that is important for Europe as a whole.These countries, and others in the East, still have ancestral
memories of the Ottoman Empire and its depredations over hundreds of years.
They know
that all civilisations periodically face the ‘Other’, and that it is in this
that they are tested.A nation, people
or civilisation who are unable to distinguish what is ‘Other’ has lost its
sense of Self, of Identity, and is vulnerable to being taken by the ‘Other’ as
New Orleans was to being flooded by the sea when the levees broke.
Defence
against the ‘Other’ is what all civilisation has ever been about, it is the
ancient myth of Osiris keeping back the chaos of Set and the desert.A civilisation or nation that opens its arms
to the ‘Other’ has lost the will to live and submits to its own demise.
The war
for the soul of Europe has now begun.We must find our Self, and repel the Other.The alternative is for Europe, the jewel of civilisation, to sink
into an endless night of oblivion, as chaos rushes in and its light is
extinguished.
Equality, a concept which has
been working on the Western psyche for some two or three centuries, has now,
having infiltrated itself into our very bones, become weaponised against us in
our every thought, word and deed.
Who can argue against
Equality?Who can gainsay such a noble
aspiration, seeking as it does to recognise the Divine Soul within all
Humanity?
But how shall we apply it?Shall all tall people be made equal with the
short?How shall it be applied between
those of different abilities or accomplishments?And of course how should it be applied between different cultures
an value systems?
Equality before the law, and
equality of opportunity are simple, because they can actually be observed and
controlled to the degree of quality and quantity of their realisation.
But beyond here, as they say,
lies nothing.
I am not the equal of
Michelangelo, Proust or Elizabeth I.In
the realm of human endeavour there is infinite diversity of
accomplishment.An infinite variety of
aptitudes and inclinations, unique in every individual.And yet in many areas of life the Equality
agenda is being enforced.Achievement
is not rewarded so as not to hurt the feelings of those who have not achieved. Everyone has to feel good whether they have done
anything worth feeling good about or not.Gay ‘families’ which cannot produce children are considered equal to old
fashioned heterosexual ones that serve to deliver the next generation of our
people.
(I shall address the matter of
male/female equality in a separate piece, but for now let me address that of
cultural equality.)
This is also being applied to the
populations of European countries as a whole, who are being told repeatedly
that they are no different from the muslim hordes who are consolidating their
position here in Europe.
The definition of Equality, has
slid towards first ‘the same’ and now ‘complete interchangeability’, which
removes the value of the individual and their uniqueness.Thus true diversity is attacked and blended
out.
This is a background mindset
which has been used to justify the importation of a foreign demographic.
In most countries throughout the
world, you only have citizenship if it is your ancestral home, so you have it
by right.Migrant workers and
businessmen have visas for the length of time they need for their work and then
leave.In Syria for instance, I have
just heard it said by a guest on R314, even when someone from abroad marries a
Syrian, it is only the children who have full citizenship.
It is, or used to be, accepted
conventional wisdom that a country’s population benefited from and inherited
the fruits of their forebears, and hopefully prospered so that their posterity
could build on this further and so on down the generations.The idea of large numbers of non related
population groups entering that society and staying there permanently would
have seemed ludicrous and alien to that nation.From a psychological point of view, there is a complete
difference between how an indigenous people regard a country’s heritage, and
incomers.
Absorbing literally millions of
outsiders of an historically oppositional culture and thinking of them as
‘Equal’ is pushing the limits of my conceptual abilities.
We are bound by this notion that
‘all souls’ are equal.
Perhaps in the sight of God, but
here on Earth us mortals have to deal with inconvenient practical issues such
as law and order and distinguishing between genuine cases of need and jihadist
infiltrators.
And we hear ludicrous arguments such as ‘It’s only an
accident of birth that you are European, we have as much right to be there as
you.’I don’t where to start with
nonsense such as this.It seems to
propose a kind of universe where anyone can and is anything without any
history, experience, or qualification.There is no continuity, no thread connecting the meaning and purpose of
your life.‘Abdullah had a dream of
living in Europe’.As if abandoning
your ancestral people and claiming a place amongst another people to whom you
have no connection were a perfectly normal thing to do.The Cultural Marxists don’t recognise
family, kin or tribe.Hey, we’re all
human, we all bleed, right?What’s
yours is mine, okay?
We have met the enemy, and
believe me, they are not us.
There are entirely different
civilisational streams going on here.To suggest that they could be equal is not only wrong, but dangerous.And they are definitely not the same.The culturally Marxist eroded values of the
West imagine that their values of pathological altruism will be reciprocate by
the new arrivals.That they just need
to be hugged and given a good job.It
is beyond the understanding of many that the ideology under which they have
often spent their entire lives entails the premise that everyone else who is
not part of islam must be subjected to it or die.Predators and enemies exist, and are not just our own paranoid
projections that we need to get over.You cannot convert an enemy who is determined to be resistant to your
compassion.He will only despise your
weakness.
It is not a happy time when the
pathological altruist meets the jihadist, or even just a simple muslim women in
a sack.The liberal is unable to
understand that these people are foundationally opposed to our way of
life.To them, ‘Equality’ is submission
on your knees to their vile dogma.
I shall have to post a piece
specifically dealing with that subject soon, but for now I shall contain myself
to the opposite natures of islam and our own dying continental religion,
Christianity.Clearly they are not
equal.One forgives, and one
conquers.One is softness and charity,
the other sternness and steel.‘Strike
off the fingertips of the Unbeliever’ (Surah 8:12)
They could have been deliberately
crafted as natural opposites, and there are those that believe they were.
The thing is, that in Nature,
there is very little Equality.Or at
least of the sort that Leftists desire.Although there is one type of Equality that is fundamental to the
physical existence of the universe, and that is the Law of Entropy.Heat tends to move from areas of greater
intensity to those of lesser, thereby equalling its distribution.This will one day result in the heat death
of the universe it is thought.
However, there is in the world a
force which, while it does not entirely negate the effects of entropy,
nonetheless does work against it, and this is the force we know as life.
It is argued that since life
involves drawing energy in and concentrating it in forms and structures within
the organism, its existence cannot be accounted for by purely mechanical laws.
The bit I really like is that the
concentration of energy through extraction and refinement is exactly what
Alchemy was all about, in both the spiritual as well as the material
realms.The extraction and development
of Essence.
The Prima Materia of raw matter,
or the inexperienced or ignorant person must go through the refining and
improvement process, as in smelting of metal from ore and working it with
hammers.
Passage through rites which lead
to progression on one’s soul path advances one in wisdom and in worth.The coward who flees the battle and is hunted
down after the battle like a dog is of less worth than the peasant who faces
his death at the hands of the barbarian with a pitchfork in hand when the
reavers come for him and his family.
There are qualities that are
better, and there are those that are worse.
And so it is with peoples and
their cultures.Europe has distilled
perceptions and ideas through the primacy of Reason and won a balance of
freedom of expression with good manners and tolerance.Within the parameters created by what was
loosely known as Christendom.I don’t
consider myself a Christian any more, but for a thousand years or more it was
the basis of a coherent civilisation.So long as it was able to see itself as the guardian of special value
not found elsewhere in the world, and protect that, it was a viable morphic
field.
But over the generations during
my own lifetime this has been lost.The
European civilisation which was to abolish slavery within its jurisdiction,
possibly the greatest collective moral achievement of the entire history of the
human race, has somehow lost its confidence to the degree where we are now
incredibly blamed for all the ills of the world, rather than thanked and
appreciated for all that we have done as a family of peoples and civilisation.
The weaponised use of the concept
of Equality has led to the total infiltration of European civilisation, a
demographic time bomb which will cause immense problems in the future.Ecological models of introduced species to
islands such as Australia or Britain demonstrate how damaging to the ecosystem
these can be.Human communities are no
different.We should remember the Red
Squirrel.
There is much discussion of how
this serves the global corporations with cheap labour and so forth, but the
greater goal is clearly to destroy the European civilisation and its peoples
for it is they who have the potential to subvert and remove the global
elites.Without their obsession with
‘standards’ and ‘ethics’ we would have Bhopals every week in the developing
world.
‘Equality’ in the manner of the
Cultural Marxists is nothing else than the attempted radical disempowerment of
the whole of the human race.It seeks
to remove us from our roots and homogenise us into one global McDonalds
culture.
Europe has become like a soft
fruit, ripe and juicy to be plucked, sweet to the taste.But I think there is a hard stone at the
centre on which the teeth of the invader will break.
‘The stone which was rejected has
become the foundation block’.That
stone is both the essence and the seed of a new generation which will grow
again.
